By Jonathan Easton
Users should not assume that they actually own their digital purchases – at least that’s what Amazon is trying to argue.
A Californian woman sued Amazon in April on behalf of users in the state over the claim that the company “secretly reserves the right” to withdraw content from Prime Video – even if it is a TV show or movie purchased by the users.
Amazon’s attorney, David Biderman, wrote: “Plaintiff claims that Defendant Amazon’s Prime Video service, which allows consumers to purchase video content for streaming or download, misleads consumers because sometimes that video content might later become unavailable if a third-party rights’ holder revokes or modifies Amazon’s license.
“The Complaint points vaguely to online commentary about this alleged potential harm but does not identify any Prime Video purchase unavailable to Plaintiff herself. In fact, all of the Prime Video content that Plaintiff has ever purchased remains available.”
The lawyer goes on to further discredit Caudel, saying that she had purchased 13 additional titles since the suit’s filing.
While this is the latest major incidence of dispute over the ownership of digital content, this has been a recurring issue in the videogames industry. In 2019, two Lord of the Rings franchise-branded Lego games were controversially removed from digital marketplaces because the licensing terms for selling the games expired, while a number of Marvel-branded games were similarly removed from digital storefronts in 2014 for a similar reason.
This does all however raise concern over the nature of content ownership in an increasingly digital age. Many gamers still prefer to buy physical disks, but the ‘death of the DVD’ has been well-charted as streaming continues to dominate the industry. https://www.digitaltveurope.com